IRS De minimis Safe Harbor Election for assets

SHARE THIS POST
Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest

Source: https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-15-82.pdf

Increase in De Minimis Safe Harbor Limit for Taxpayers Without an Applicable Financial
Statement
Notice 2015-82
PURPOSE
This notice provides an increase in the de minimis safe harbor limit provided in
§ 1.263(a)-1(f)(1)(ii)(D) of the Income Tax Regulations for a taxpayer without an
applicable financial statement (“AFS”).
BACKGROUND
On September 17, 2013, the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue
Service (“IRS”) issued final regulations under §§ 1.162-3, 1.162-4, 1.263(a)-1, 1.263(a)-
2, and 1.263(a)-3 (T.D. 9636, 2013-43 I.R.B. 331, 78 Fed. Reg. 57686) to provide
guidance on the application of §§ 162(a) and 263(a) of the Internal Revenue Code
(“Code”) to amounts paid to acquire, produce, or improve tangible property (“final
tangible property regulations”). The final tangible property regulations are applicable to
taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2014. Optionally, a taxpayer may
choose to apply the final tangible property regulations to taxable years beginning on or
after January 1, 2012, and before January 1, 2014.
In addition to clarifying the requirements under §§ 162(a) and 263(a), the tangible
property regulations also include several simplifying provisions that are elective and
prospective in application, and are intended to ease taxpayers’ compliance with the
regulations and reduce administrative burden. Section 1.263(a)-1(f), for example,

  • 2 –
    provides a de minimis safe harbor election that permits a taxpayer to not capitalize, or
    treat as a material or supply, certain amounts paid for tangible property that it acquires
    or produces during the taxable year provided the taxpayer meets certain requirements
    and the property does not exceed certain dollar limitations. If such requirements are
    met, amounts paid for the qualifying property generally may be deducted under § 162,
    provided the amount otherwise constitutes an ordinary and necessary business
    expense in carrying on a trade or business. See § 1.263(a)-1(f)(3)(iv).
    Under § 1.263(a)-1(f)(1)(ii)(D), a taxpayer without an AFS (as defined in
    § 1.263(a)-1(f)(4)) may elect to apply the de minimis safe harbor if, in addition to other
    requirements, the amount paid for the property subject to the de minimis safe harbor
    does not exceed $500 per invoice (or per item as substantiated by the invoice). In
    contrast, under § 1.263(a)-1(f)(1)(i)(D), a taxpayer with an AFS may elect to apply the
    de minimis safe harbor if, in addition to other requirements, the amount paid for the
    property does not exceed $5,000 and the taxpayer treats the amount paid as an
    expense on its AFS in accordance with its written accounting procedures. A larger safe
    harbor limitation is reasonable for a taxpayer with an AFS because an AFS provides
    independent assurance that the taxpayer’s de minimis policies are consistent with the
    requirements of generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and do not
    materially distort the taxpayer’s financial statement income.
    The de minimis safe harbor provided under § 1.263(a)-1(f) was intended as an
    administrative convenience whereby a taxpayer is permitted to deduct small dollar
    expenditures for the acquisition or production of new property or for the improvement of
  • 3 –
    existing property, which otherwise must be capitalized under § 263(a). The de minimis
    safe harbor does not limit a taxpayer’s ability to deduct otherwise deductible repair or
    maintenance costs that exceed the amount subject to the safe harbor. The safe harbor
    merely establishes a minimum threshold below which all qualifying amounts are
    considered deductible. Consistent with longstanding federal income tax rules, a
    taxpayer may continue to deduct all otherwise deductible repair or maintenance costs,
    regardless of amount.
    After the final tangible property regulations were issued, the Treasury
    Department and the IRS received numerous letters from representatives of small
    business taxpayers requesting that the Treasury Department and the IRS increase the
    de minimis safe harbor limit for taxpayers that do not have an AFS. In Rev. Proc. 2015-
    20, 2015-9 I.R.B. 694, the Treasury Department and the IRS formally requested
    comments on whether it is appropriate to increase the de minimis safe harbor limit
    provided in § 1.263(a)-1(f)(1)(ii)(D) for a taxpayer without an AFS to an amount greater
    than $500, and, if so, what amount should be used and the justification for considering
    that amount appropriate.
    DISCUSSION
    The Treasury Department and the IRS received more than 150 comment letters
    suggesting an increase in the amount of the de minimis safe harbor limit for taxpayers
    without an AFS. The suggested increased amount ranged from $750 to $100,000.
    Generally, commenters wrote that the $500 limitation was too low to effectively reduce
    the administrative burden of complying with the capitalization requirement for small
  • 4 –
    business taxpayers that frequently purchase tangible property in their trades and
    businesses. Commenters noted that the cost of many commonly expensed items (for
    example, tablet-style personal computers, smart phones, and machinery and equipment
    parts) typically surpass the current $500 per item or invoice threshold provided in
    § 1.263(a)-1(f)(1)(ii)(D). Commenters also stated that the $500 threshold does not
    correspond to the financial accounting policies of many small businesses, which
    frequently permit the deduction of amounts in excess of $500 as immaterial.
    Commenters noted that without an increase in the de minimis safe harbor limit for
    taxpayers without an AFS, a capitalization threshold in excess of $500 can only be
    substantiated by establishing that a taxpayer’s policy results in the clear reflection of
    income for federal income tax purposes, resulting in additional burden and uncertainty
    for taxpayers. Finally, many commenters expressed concern regarding the disparate
    treatment of taxpayers with an AFS compared to those without an AFS under the safe
    harbor requirements, stating that obtaining an AFS is cost prohibitive for many small
    businesses and does not adequately justify the substantially lower de minimis ceiling for
    these taxpayers.
    Section 1.263(a)-1(f)(1)(ii)(D) permits the IRS to change the safe harbor limit to
    an amount identified in published guidance in the Federal Register or in the Internal
    Revenue Bulletin (see § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)).
    Having considered taxpayers’ comments, the goal of the final tangible property
    regulations to reduce administrative burden, and the concern that taxpayers’ methods of
    accounting clearly reflect income, the § 1.263(a)-1(f)(1)(ii)(D) de minimis safe harbor
  • 5 –
    limitation for a taxpayer without an AFS is increased from $500 to $2,500.
    EFFECTIVE DATE
    This Notice is effective for costs incurred during taxable years beginning on or
    after January 1, 2016.
    AUDIT PROTECTION
    For taxable years beginning before January 1, 2016, the IRS will not raise upon
    examination the issue of whether a taxpayer without an AFS can utilize the de minimis
    safe harbor provided in § 1.263(a)-1(f)(1)(ii) for an amount not to exceed $2,500 per
    invoice (or per item as substantiated by invoice) if the taxpayer otherwise satisfies the
    requirements of § 1.263(a)-1(f)(1)(ii). Moreover, if the taxpayer’s use of the de minimis
    safe harbor provided in § 1.263(a)-1(f)(1)(ii) is an issue under consideration in
    examination, appeals, or before the U.S. Tax Court in a taxable year that begins after
    December 31, 2011, and ends before January 1, 2016, the issue relates to the
    qualification under the safe harbor of an amount (or amounts) that does not exceed
    $2,500 per invoice (or per item as substantiated by invoice), and the taxpayer otherwise
    satisfies the requirements of § 1.263(a)-1(f)(1)(ii), then the IRS will not further pursue
    the issue.
    CONTACT INFORMATION
    The principal author of this notice is Christine Merson of the Office of Associate
    Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting). For further information regarding this
    notice, contact Ms. Merson at (202) 317-5100 (not a toll-free number).

Leave a Comment